The increasingly heightened tone made the discourse used between the two sides of the conflict a highly polarized one. Although the first few months of the armed revolution in Syria witnessed a sort of negotiation at the end of 2011, the concept of negotiation remained shy till the present time. Or let's say it did not lead to reducing the hieghtened tone of mottos or make a significant change in the discourse used, while the military clashes ended up in striking a destructive balance that achieve depletion but not victory. Moreover, the fact that a part of the clash is controlled by external balances contributed in a way or another to this shy presence of negotiation and increased the local political paralysis for the wider settlement. Yet the local observer has his own spectacles in whih he tries to find what is possible in addition to what is required.